Impact of respiratory infectious epidemics on STEMI incidence and care.

The effect of respiratory infectious diseases on STEMI incidence, but also STEMI care is not well understood. The Influenza 2017/2018 epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic were chosen as observational periods to investigate the effect of respiratory virus diseases on these outcomes in a metropolitan area with an established STEMI network. We analyzed data on incidence and care during the COVID-19 pandemic, Influenza 2017/2018 epidemic and corresponding seasonal control periods. Three comparisons were performed: (1) COVID-19 pandemic group versus pandemic control group, (2) COVID-19 pandemic group versus Influenza 2017/2018 epidemic group and (3) Influenza 2017/2018 epidemic group versus epidemic control group. We used Student's t-test, Fisher's exact test and Chi square test for statistical analysis. 1455 patients were eligible. The daily STEMI incidence was 1.49 during the COVID-19 pandemic, 1.40 for the pandemic season control period, 1.22 during the Influenza 2017/2018 epidemic and 1.28 during the epidemic season control group. Median symptom-to-contact time was 180 min during the COVID-19 pandemic. In the pandemic season control group it was 90 min (p = 0.183), and in the Influenza 2017/2018 cohort it was 90 min, too (p = 0.216). Interval in the epidemic control group was 79 min (p = 0.733). The COVID-19 group had a door-to-balloon time of 49 min, corresponding intervals were 39 min for the pandemic season group (p = 0.038), 37 min for the Influenza 2017/2018 group (p = 0.421), and 38 min for the epidemic season control group (p = 0.429). In-hospital mortality was 6.1% for the COVID-19 group, 5.9% for the Influenza 2017/2018 group (p = 1.0), 11% and 11.2% for the season control groups. The respiratory virus diseases neither resulted in an overall treatment delay, nor did they cause an increase in STEMI mortality or incidence. The registry analysis demonstrated a prolonged door-to-balloon time during the COVID-19 pandemic.

[Pulmonary metastasectomy in renal cell carcinoma]. / Lungenmetastasenchirurgie beim Nierenzellkarzinom.

BACKGROUND: In patients with isolated meta- or synchronous pulmonary metastases from renal cell cancer, lung metastasectomy could be an appropriate treatment option after successful treatment of primary cancer. OBJECTIVES: Presentation of lung metastasectomy as a treatment option in patients with pulmonary metastatic renal cell cancer and the postoperative outcome. Description of alternative treatment modalities focusing on "targeted therapies". MATERIALS AND METHODS: Systematical literature research and qualitative analysis of studies on patients undergoing lung metastasectomy after primary nephrectomy published since 01 January 2000. We assessed operative findings, survival data, and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Pulmonary metastasectomy results in a median postmetastasectomy survival of 26-94 months. The 5­year survival rates vary between 33 and 58%. The patients' prognosis depends on a prolonged disease-free interval and complete resection of all suspected metastases. In particular, number and location of lung metastases should play a minor role for the indication for lung metastasectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary metastasectomy should be considered the treatment of choice in selected patients with successfully resected primary cancer showing no evidence of extrapulmonary metastases and having guaranteed operability and complete resection.

[Role of Laser Resection in Pulmonary Metastasectomy]. / Die Rolle der Laserresektion in der Lungenmetastasenchirurgie.

Objectives This review presents laser resection as treatment option in pulmonary metastasectomy and summarizes the current evidence. Moreover, it includes the comparison of laser resection and common techniques used in lung metastasectomy. Methods We performed a systematic literature research in Medline and the Cochrane library to detect case series and even randomized trials. All included studies underwent qualitative analysis. Results Laser metastasectomy is a safe procedure. Data regarding relevant clinical end points as hospitalization, duration of chest tube drainage and long-term survival are heterogeneous and still controversial. Laser enucleation decreases the resection volume. Therefore, it leads to a significant reduction of parenchymal loss. Survival rates after laser metastasectomy are equal to the outcome after resection using other techniques. Conclusions Laser resection is a parenchyma-sparing method. Hence, it offers radical metastasectomy even in case of multiple pulmonary lesions or impaired lung capacity.

[Surgical therapy of lung metastases from head and neck cancer]. / Chirurgische Therapie pulmonaler Metastasen von Kopf-Hals-Tumoren.

Pulmonary metastasectomy is an established procedure in oncological therapeutic concepts. A systematic literature search and an analysis of all studies published since 01.01.2000 should evaluate the advantage of pulmonary metastasectomy for patients with primary head and neck cancer. Lung metastases develop in 1.9-13% of head and neck cancer patients. Following metastasectomy, patients reach a median survival of 9.5-78 months and 5-year survival rates of up to 58% are achieved. Intrathoracic recurrence occurs in 18.4-81.8% of patients, selected instances of which can be successfully treated by remetastasectomy. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma have the worst prognosis, but could also become long-term survivors (≥ 60 months). Pulmonary metastasectomy is frequently the only potentially curative therapeutic approach and offers a better long-term survival than nonsurgical therapies. Lung metastasectomy is thus the treatment of choice in selected patients with pulmonary metastases from primary head and neck cancer.